- Actors: Wu Jing, Zhang Ziyi, Zhang Yi
- Director: Daniel Lee
- Disc Format: Dolby, Subtitled, Surround Sound, Widescreen
- Language: Mandarin Chinese (DTS 5.1)
- Subtitles: English, Mandarin Chinese
- Region: Region A/1
- Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
- Number of discs: 1
- Rated: NR
- Studio: Well Go Usa
- DVD Release Date: February 25, 2020
- Run Time: 125 minutes
The process of reviewing recent Chinese
releases (particularly blockbusters) is becoming somewhat redundant. With each
film, I find myself criticizing the same two points; bad effects and worse
nationalism. And with their industry quickly surpassing Hollywood as the most
profitable, there are absolutely no incentives for them alter the formula I am
just as quickly tiring of. Even with the dramatic retelling of historical
events, it is not uncommon for there to be an overreliance on poorly executed
CGI. The Climbers insists on making its
characters inhumanly heroic in their abilities, which is almost as ridiculous
as the transparent Chinese nationalism that runs through every scene of
dialogue. It almost seems as though the absurd abilities the CGI gives the
heroic characters is meant to solidify this idea that Chinese patriotism is
paired with superhuman abilities. In a genre film, this could be forgiven as
escapism, but in The Climbers, it is
only in service of bad melodrama.
The film follows
the true story of the members of the China Everest Climbing Commando as they
attempt to prove the claim that China was the first to scale the mountain from
the North Ridge. After the leader of the first climb in 1960 was tragically killed,
Fang Wuzhou (Jing Wu) led the remaining men to the top. On the way, Fang makes
the difficult choice to let the camera fall, so that he can save the cameraman.
As a result, certain members of the international mountain climbing community
refuse to take the Chinese at their word, denying official recognition. And
since reputation and Chinese pride seems to be everything, a new group is put
together to risk more lives for the honor.
Unable to live
with his perceived failure, Fang takes on the task of heading up the mission,
training an all-new group of climbers. Joining them is weather expert and Fang’s
romantic interest, Xu Ying (Ziyi Zhang), who has waited patiently for a life
with a man obsessed with his past. This relationship may lack any real context
or realism, but it makes up for it with an avalanche of manipulative melodrama
and contrived scenarios. The only thing more calculating is the claim that
Jackie Chan is in the film, when you could easily miss him if you blinked.
As terrible and
unnecessary as much of the dramatic aspects of the storyline are, the main film
for watching a film like this (or any climbing film, for that matter) is the
suspense of the sequences of dangerous mountain traversing. The Climbers doesn’t bother getting
pulled down by accurate depictions or thoughtful examinations of what it
actually takes to complete the feats, but instead settles for ridiculous scenes
such as a climber removing his shoes to climb better barefoot. Then there are
the times that tragedy falls, either because someone slips or an avalanche
threatens to take them out, in which case some unrealistically heroic fit
somehow manages to save them from the green screen threats. An entire wall of
ice even falls on a character, but he is somehow strong enough to endure the
blow with his body.
If you can’t
tell yet, I was not impressed with nearly any aspect of The Climbers. The bad melodrama could have been forgiven if the
action were more believable, and the awful CGI sequences may have been more
endurable if these felt like real people rather than living depictions of statues erected as a
tribute. In short, this movie treats its audience like simpletons, which doesn’t
encourage a thoughtful analysis from viewers. To put it bluntly, this movie is
stupid. At times, it is also stupidly entertaining, but only incidentally.
The Blu-ray
release for The Climbers contains a
behind-the-scenes featurette, as well as trailers. The only other reason for
watching this film in high definition is to see that the CGI looks bad in any
format. This movie isn’t awful, but it is far closer to that than it is to ‘good.’
Entertainment Value:
5/10
Quality of
Filmmaking: 4/10
Historical
Significance: 2/10
Special Features: 2.5/10
No comments:
Post a Comment
Agree? Disagree? Questions for the class? All comments are welcome...