- Actors: Brie Larson, Samuel L. Jackson
- Directors: Anna Boden, Ryan Fleck
- Disc Format: Dolby, NTSC, Subtitled
- Language: English (Dolby Digital 2.0), English (DTS-HD High Res Audio), French (Dolby Digital 5.1), Spanish (Dolby Digital 5.1)
- Subtitles: English, French, Spanish
- Region: Region A/1
- Aspect Ratio: 2.39:1
- Number of discs: 1
- Rated: PG-13
- Studio: MARVEL
- Release Date: June 11, 2019
- Run Time: 124 minutes
Captain Marvel marked the arrival of the first
female-led superhero film from Marvel Studios, a fact that would have been far
more impactful if it weren’t for that other superhero franchise getting there
first and the fact that it took Marvel so many years (and sooo many movies) to
finally release one themselves. The film itself, with some distance from its
theatrical release, is likely to be best remembered for the petty online
bickering between its star and internet trolls (from which neither emerged
looking great) rather than any content in the movie itself. This seems
especially true now that Avengers:
Endgame has made Captain Marvel’s contributions to the franchise almost
inconsequential, save a cheesy female-pride sequence during its final battle.
Taking place in the 1990s as a way to put a pin in the whole
Avengers situation, Captain Marvel
actually begins with a lengthy sequence in space. Carol Danvers (Brie Larson),
or Vers as we first know her, is a soldier fighting with one alien race against
another one (I could go into more details, but those who care likely already
know the names of these alien races). She is on the side of the ones that look
more human, so obviously we assume these to be the good guys despite her mentor
(Jude Law) using some tellingly chauvinistic terminology in early scenes. In
their battle against the oppositional aliens, Vers follows them to Earth, at
which point it is the 1990s.
This gives Marvel Studios another reason to utilize CGI in
order to change the age of an actor, and this time it is Samuel L. Jackson’s
turn to look younger for an entire film as a younger Nick Fury. It is awful and
plastic looking, but much of the movie has this same glossy veneer of artifice.
Even the cat featured heavily in the film only feels real for a handful of
shots in the movie. But even worse than the badly artificial look of the movie
is the painful screenplay, from plot holes to dialogue that sounds better
suited for a CW superhero show. Also, despite Nick Fury looking younger, he is
incompetent and ill-suited for any aspect of fighting in this film, likely to
emasculate him in the name of feminism. Most telling is the reason revealed for
his use of an eye patch in the modern-time Marvel films.
Shamefully unsubtle from beginning to end, it is always clear
what Captain Marvel’s agenda is,
which should have been obvious to audiences after the painful way the trailer
allowed the ‘h-e-r’ of the word ‘hero’ to linger a bit longer than the ‘o.’ But
regardless of the significance of a female her-o (and it’s significance was
made clear to me by the exuberance of a young girl watching the film in the
same theater as me on opening day), the film still has to be good. Captain Marvel is a movie. More
specifically, it is a Marvel movie, which is a studio owned by the Walt Disney
Company. It might seem like I am dodging the question of quality, but I believe
that those statements are enough.
If you have seen any of the Marvel movies since Disney got
its greedy white gloves on the properties, you have pretty much seen any of
them. Sure, there are slight differences in themes and your enjoyment is likely
to vary depending on your affinity to one hero over another; on occasion the
director’s style even manages to defy the production-line methods of filmmaking
for some semblance of stylistic expression (most notably Thor: Ragnarok). But most of the time, the Marvel movies are
predictable, cookie-cutter, moderately enjoyable products which are the
cinematic equivalent to junk food.
It may sound like I am being harsh (and I am), but that is
mostly because of how unimportant this film ended up being in the scheme of the
Marvel universe and due to how high my hopes were for filmmakers Anna Boden and
Ryan Fleck. After having made their name with spectacular independent dramas
like Half Nelson and Sugar, films driven by the well-written
characters and dialogue, Captain Marvel
feels like a de-evolution. Whereas their independent films were built upon
realism and subtlety, Captain Marvel
brings them to the world of bad CGI and worse dialogue. When it isn’t awkwardly
cramming a female-power (more so than feminist) agenda, the film is just
obvious one-liners and a lot of pretty visuals.
I’m sure there is plenty in this film for younger audience
members (boys and girls alike) to enjoy, but I need a little more intelligence
to the films I watch, even if they involve flying heroes and space travel. I
expect more from the script, the characters, and even the digital effects.
Superhero films keep getting larger and larger thanks to computer generated
effects, but they are also feeling less and less grounded in any reality that I
care about.
For anyone invested in the petty arguments that were had by
so-called feminists and so-called male rights activists (I use the phrase
‘so-called’ because I don’t believe it is true feminism at stake, and because
the existence of male rights activism is absurd), the special features provide
more fuel for the fire. One of the most obnoxious scenes in the film for me was
an obvious reference to the internet battles over stupid troll comments. Some
idiots online thought that Larson’s Marvel should have been smiling in the
posters, so she changed a bunch of other Marvel posters to put smiles on the
male heroes. It was all petty and stupid, mostly because she was feeding right
into what the anonymous trolls hope for. They don’t use logic in their
arguments, and lowering yourself to their standards just debases the issue
further. In other words, I wish Larson would take a cue from the famous
Michelle Obama quote about responding to ‘low’ blows.
But I digress. The Captain
Marvel Blu-ray (and I am assuming the other home entertainment options)
comes with a handful of deleted scenes, some of which are likely to encourage
the petty bickering between groups. One in particular involves a violent attack
against a man for the mere suggestion that she smile. Ignoring the obvious
overreaction (and poor role modeling) displayed in this clip, it is just bad
filmmaking and likely why a subtler option was chosen. It is understandable why
most of the deleted scenes were removed, making them a bit dull to watch. The
gag reel is understandably more enjoyable. There are also a handful of
making-of featurettes, most of which are promotional and brief. An audio
commentary featuring the filmmakers is also available, although it was
disheartening for me to hear these two pat themselves on the back for selling
out.
Entertainment Value:
7/10
Quality of
Filmmaking: 6/10
Historical Significance:
5/10
Special Features: 6/10
No comments:
Post a Comment
Agree? Disagree? Questions for the class? All comments are welcome...