- Actors: Shahab Hosseini, Taraneh Alidoosti, Babak Karimi, Mina Sadati
- Director: Asghar Farhadi
- Producer: Asghar Farhadi
- Format: AC-3, Dolby, Subtitled, Widescreen
- Language: Farsi
- Subtitles: English, Spanish
- Region: Region A/1
- Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
- Rated: PG-13
- Studio: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
- Release Date: May 2, 2017
- Run Time: 124 minutes
There are
numerous ways to approach thinking about The
Salesman, a deceptively simple film from Iranian filmmaker Asghar Farhadi
and the winner of Best Foreign film at this year’s Academy Awards. Although
resembling a basic revenge narrative, it is also a film that is distinctly
Iranian. At the same time, the film comments on the differences between East
and West in the depiction of an Iranian stage adaptation of Arthur Miller’s “Death
of a Salesman.” But the beauty of Farhadi’s work is not simply that it is a
revenge narrative, nor that it has commentary on cultural differences, but in
the way that it accomplishes both of these tasks with subtlety and ambiguity.
Even as I continue to think about the end, I am constantly faced with shifting
certainty about the events in the film and their meaning.
As with many of
Farhadi’s films, the story centers on the relationship and home life of a
couple clearly representing a larger group in Iranian society. Emad (Shahab
Hosseini) and Rana (Taraneh Alidoosti) are a young married couple who are both
artists, coincidentally also acting as spouses in a stage adaptation of Miller’s
play. Whether we are meant to compare the relationship between the stage couple
and the actors is unclear, especially when comparison between the fictional
characters and an elderly couple also becomes available in the final act of the
film. This is one of many allegorical connections developed in this richly
layered film.
Another of them
occurs almost immediately after the film begins, when the apartment building
Emad and Rana live in begins to crumble due to nearby construction, also
serving a practical function to move the narrative forward. Forced to find a
new place to live, Emad and Rana move into the former home of a young woman who
happens to have a questionable reputation. Burdened with the former tenant’s
belongings, the couple does their best to make the new apartment home, until an
unexpected visit throws their life into turmoil.
One evening
after working on their play, Rana is alone in the apartment when an
acquaintance of the former tenant arrives. Thinking it is her husband arriving
home from a meeting about the censorship of their play, Rana buzzes the man
into the building and opens the door of the apartment. We do not see the events
that follow, leaving a great deal of ambiguity for the remainder of the film.
Even Emad is left in the dark about the precise details, though the fact that
the neighbors find Rana naked and injured in the bathroom is enough for him to come
to certain conclusions. Rana’s behavior following the incident is further
evidence, causing Emad to become obsessive in his search for answers.
While Rana
begins to withdraw into herself, refusing to be alone in the apartment and no
longer able to endure the male gazes during her performances, Emad seeks some
sort of retribution for the way his wife was wronged. The narrative builds like
a mystery, continuing long after we have discovered the culprit. Even when we
know who entered their apartment, there remains the question of what exactly
happened in the bathroom, and perhaps more importantly, what Emad will do with
this information. More of a cultural meditation on revenge than a revenge film
itself, The Salesman leads to a final
act showdown with suspense not reliant on violence or action but upon the
response and reaction to information by the characters involved.
Upon first
viewing, it would seem that there are too many questions left unanswered. There
is too much unknown by the audience in the events themselves, but this is where
Farhadi’s masterful filmmaking leaves the audience with clues for
consideration. We may not know exactly what happened in-between the scenes we
are allowed to witness, but there are numerous allegories throughout the film
that offer ways to interpret the clues. In other words, even without knowing
what happened to Rana, we are affected by the commentary on societal response
to the events.
The manner in which even incidental
supporting characters act can offer possible meaning for the film as a whole,
just as the crumbling of Rana and Emad’s former home seems to have significant
implications. And these are just the minor comparisons which can be made, while
many larger ones are at the forefront, including the title being drawn from the
play being performed by our two protagonists. What the connection is between
fictional material and the events in the narrative must be decided individually
by each viewer, just as the truth about Rana’s attack and the subsequent state
of the couple’s relationship is left to interpretation. Farhadi is a filmmaker
of great talent, not only for his abilities as a storyteller but for his
willingness to allow the audience to participate in an understanding of the
complex material.
The Blu-ray release includes a
featurette that has an interview with Farhadi, which is insightful without
spelling out the entire meaning of the film for viewers. There are no
alternative ways of viewing the film, and though Farhadi’s filmmaking is growing
increasingly cinematic, there is little need for a high definition presentation
of a film as subdued as The Salesman.
Entertainment Value:
7/10
Quality of
Filmmaking: 9/10
Historical
Significance: 8.5/10
Special Features: 4/10
No comments:
Post a Comment
Agree? Disagree? Questions for the class? All comments are welcome...